Mercer County Prosecutors Office Anti Violence Awareness Art Contest 2018

Practise YOU SEE WHAT EYE SITS BY THE Ocean?

[ENLARGE]

SECOND JANUARY TWO-Thousand NINETEEN

AND ON THE VERY SAME Mean solar day

3-THIRTEEN IS OUT

DID YOU CATCH Information technology?

FOLLOWING FROM

THIRD FEBRUARY Ii-THOUSAND NINETEEN, THE 34TH DAY T MINUS 3 Zero 5: ONOFRI HAS SOME EXPLAINING TO Practise, AND THE UNCERTAIN CONCLUSION OF THE CASE NAMED HEREUPON BAETYL  PICKETTERS' CHARGE.

20-FIRST DECEMBER Two-M Eighteen, 3 ZERO Three

EIGHTEENTH NOVEMBER 2-Thousand Eighteen, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE Thirty-FOUR: THE OPRA HARVEST

SEVENTEENTH November Ii-THOUSAND 18, "REPORTING THAT THE Accused TOOK A PHOTO OF SOMEONE ELSE'S PHONE WITH SECURITY CODES AND PUBLISHED IT ONLINE. CALLER WAS ADVISED OF HIS RIGHTS TO SIGN COMPLAINTS"

SEVENTEENTH Nov Two-1000 EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS Three 30-Three: THE MANIFESTO OF JOSEPH CLARK, THE ATTORNEY FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF HOWELL

SIXTEENTH Nov TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH Day T PLUS 3 2: TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, REFER TO THE THIRTY-FOURTH PAGE ENUMERATED THIRTY-SIX IN THE FIFTY-TWO PAGE DISCOVERY Packet FOR PICKETTERS' CHARGE THAT WAS EXHIBITED ON SIXTEENTH November SANS COMMENTARY Albeit WITH NECESSARY REDACTIONS. THAT PRESENCE OF THAT Page AND THE NAME THEREUPON, CARA MCCOLLUM, HATH BEEN REMARKED UPON IN THE ORIGINAL SEQUENCE OF THE 34TH Twenty-four hour period. Yet, THAT Certificate IN THAT Space REMAINS A MYSTERY FOR WHICH NEITHER THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR'Due south OFFICE, NOR THE TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE HATH PROFFERED AN EXPLANATION. THAT PAGE Apart OF Two Three NINE.

YOURS TRULY THE ONE-TIME Babysitter OF SHE Then NAMED. [CLICK TO EXPAND]

FOURTEENTH Nov 2-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS Three 30: ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC AND THE MISSING EMAIL

THIRTEENTH November TWO-THOUSAND Eighteen, Two FOUR 3 AND Ii FOUR FOUR

FIRST Nov TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH 24-hour interval T PLUS THREE SEVENTEEN: THREE More than DOCUMENTS FROM BEHIND THE CURTAIN AND A Strange Article OBSERVED IN THE ASBURY PARK PRESS, WHEN THE LINE HATH BEEN REVERSED ON THE PLOT OF NINE TWENTY-Three, NOT FOR THE VERY First Fourth dimension, THOUGH THIS Fourth dimension RATHER ELEGANT IN TANDEM WITH TWO More IN THE TRIO, ONE To a higher place AND One BELOW, TWO 3 4 AND TWO Iv Iii , Cheers MUCH, THE ARTICLE FROM THE ASBURY PARK PRESS EXHIBITED ON THE Start OF NOVEMBER DATED THE SAME, THE Aforementioned Appointment A TRIO AGAINST LAWRENCE ISSUED Engagement THE Aforementioned, THAT ARTICLE REGARDING THE Comport OF THE HOWELL TOWNSHIP MUNICIPALITY ON THE Aforementioned TOPIC OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW OF LAND IN THE Affair OF THE OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT, DAMAGE CONTROL AFTER THE FIRST SALVO UNLEASHED Confronting THAT TOWN SOME DAYS Earlier, NUMBERED ONE, 2 AND THREE Post-obit FROM Ii-HUNDRED Thirty-FOUR.

TWENTY-Sixth Oct TWO-THOUSAND EIGHTEEN, Ii Three Four, TWO THREE Five, AND TWO THREE SIX, WHERE Post-obit FROM THE HOWELL TOWNSHIP MUNICIPALITY Nearly CERTAINLY DID RETALIATE AGAINST THE REQUESTOR NAMED THRICE Beneath.

TWENTY-THIRD OCTOBER TWO-G EIGHTEEN, THE 34TH DAY T PLUS THREE EIGHT: THE MOBIUS DEFINED, County MONMOUTH THROUGH ZONE, County MERCER

WHAT DID We Acquire?

RETALIATION IS ALREADY Accounted FOR IN THE MATHS OF OBTAINING PUBLIC RECORDS FROM THE MUNICIPAL Racket, YES INDEED, FACTORED INTO WHAT OTHERWISE SHOULD BE ROUTINE AND LAWFUL CONDUCT OF ENTITIES IN THIS Land WHEREIN RETALIATION Equally SUCH HATH BEEN SO NAMED HEREUPON BAETYL MANY TIMES, Eye FOR AN Centre , FOR EVERY SINGLE THING IN FAVOR OF THE TARGET, ONE Signal, AYE, THE Antagonist DEMANDS AN EYE IN REVENGE, AYE AYE.

IN ONE OR More than CASES, THAT EYE IS LEFT OF FIELD TO THE FIELD OF PLAY, BROUGHT TO FIELD IN Print THE VERY Aforementioned DAY, Most THE RACKET, Mayhap AFTER A CALL TO THE Press, Telephone call IN A FAVOR, Delight TO THE PUBLIC, PUT THE TRUTH UNDER DURESS.

IN I OR More CASES However, RETALIATION DID INDEED OCCUR IN THE CASES ALREADY THEN BEFORE A Courtroom, THE HOWELL TOWNSHIP BUT OF COURSE, WHEREIN THE VERY ACT OF LITERACY RISKS LIFE AND LIMB, WHERE ONE NEED Asking AT REGULAR INTERVALS IF THE COURT HATH APPOINTED COUNSEL IN Hush-hush, AND WHEREUPON BECOMING INFORMED OF THE VERY FACT THAT COUNSEL HATH BEEN APPOINTED SURREPTITIOUSLY, THE NEXT EYE IS SOUGHT After THE LAST Centre HATH BEEN Plant, THE Instance OF Xx-SIXTH Oct TWO-M EIGHTEEN, WHEREUPON THE VERY Same DAY THE Start THREE BECAME KNOWN, Ii THREE Four, Five AND 6, THE COURT APPOINTED 1 ITS OWN EMPLOYEES AS Defense COUNSEL, HID THAT FACT FOR GREATER THAN TWO WEEKS, Then LIED Nigh THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THAT INVOLUNTARY Date WHICH WAS ONLY DISCOVERED Following FROM PERSISTENT INQUIRIES Every bit TO WHETHER COUNSEL HAD APPOINTED APPOINTED IN Hugger-mugger, AS THAT Courtroom DID THE VERY Aforementioned Thing IN THE PAST. OF Note, BOTH FEMALE APPOINTEES DID FAIL TO INFORM THEIR Client THEY HAD BEEN APPOINTED, AND THE ALL Female STAFF OF THE Courtroom DID ALSO FAIL TO PROVIDE Whatsoever Notice WHATSOEVER. VERY GROTESQUE ACTS COMPOUNDED By LIES ABOUT THOSE SAME ACTS.

AT WHICH Time WE RETURN TO SEVENTH DECEMBER 2-Thousand Eighteen

FIRST , A FACTUAL Clarification OF EVENTS, HERETOFORE PUBLISHED ON Xxx-FIRST Jan OF THIS YEAR, AND Once more REPRODUCED BELOW TO PROVIDE Total CONTEXT FOR WHAT FOLLOWS FROM.

Pursuant to P.50.1963, c.73 (C.47:1A-1 et seq.), records kept or maintained by the Township of Howell, the Howell Township Municipal Court, the Howell Township Police force Department and/or whatsoever other department in the jurisdiction of the Township of Howell, are requested and again marked required on this engagement of Request, January 30, 2019, to be in possession of both named parties in MUNICIPAL Appeal NO: 18-040 that has been FILED and is at present pending in SUPERIOR Court OF NEW Bailiwick of jersey, LAW Partitioning – CRIMINAL Function, MONMOUTH VICINAGE, and despite receiving no less than one form of discover marked FILED in the present year, no formal acknowledgment of that matter has been forthcoming from the Township of Howell, with that notice consisting of a one page document stamped "DAVID F. BAUMAN, P.J.Cr.", whereupon the appointment of "Jan 10 2019", the Howell Township Municipal Court was ORDERED to pay all fees and costs associated with preparation of the court transcript from the Municipal Hearing that did accept identify on just the one Hearing date of December vii, 2018, despite a multitude of other Hearings that did take place and are all straight related. Of note, the Violation enumerated "220-C" and/or "220-ii" that did result in MA xviii-040 was coerced on December 7, 2018, on which engagement a plea was agreed upon in lite of a false presumption provided to this requestor while seated in the Howell Township Municipal Court with no less than one Howell Township Police Officer continuing nearby post-obit from alleged threats that on this date of Asking have are non described in linguistic communication beyond the general description of "threats"otherwise absent whatever official record(s) known to this requestor. The same proximity was maintained past HTPD on what had been scheduled every bit the commencement day of a trial, during which time each and every moment this requestor was present within either the Howell Township Municipal Court or in the vestibule that presence was maintained by the female Howell Township Police force Section Officer whose badge number was identified #676 upon request and after identified in a handwritten OPRA Request dated Dec 7, 2018 that was transmit on or about 12:10 PM EST to "Dianne", who in all likelihood is or was employed by the Howell Township Police force Section Records Bureau on that date. Furthermore, that Request has not yet been fulfilled or best-selling as of the nowadays time, and the text of that OPRA Request dated "12/07/18" was photographed on or about 12:08 PM EST and is reproduced in full, including errors, as follows hereafter: "All written documents in possession of Howell Police and/or the Township of Howell describing thereupon all alleged threats this requestor made, allegedly, against Howell Court staff, the judge(s) of Howell Court, and/or other Township of Howell employees, specifically following from the allegation made by PTL S. Regin (sic), #676 that SGT. J. Lopez as her supervisor ordered ane to one monitoring of this requestor post-obit from unspecified, allegedly and explicitly false claims that threats were made i or more (sic) employees of the Township of Howell." The OPRA Asking was handwritten on 1 of the scattering of blank iv page "Open up PUBLIC RECORDS Human activity REQUEST FORM" packets observed stacked on the counter of the public facing side of the Howell Township Constabulary Department Records Bureau window that is as well located in the antechamber to the Howell Township Municipal Court. Furthermore, that bundle was obtained and completed in both physical and visual proximity to the male person HTPD Course Two Officer #324, whose surname remains unknown, and the female person HTPD Officer PTL Due south. REGINA #676, every bit prior stated. Both HTPD Officers were and then kind as to land their badge numbers aloud following from requests for identification fabricated in the moments prior to handing the completed Request course to "Dianne", despite only identifying #676 thereupon. The specific record(s) requested herein are the very aforementioned requested on December vii, 2018 and in at to the lowest degree 1 OPRA Request dated prior, both of which remain unfulfilled, wherein the prior dated and nearly identical Request regarding declared threats is highlighted in GRC Complaint 2018-303 entitled Miller five. Twp. of Howell (Monmouth), for which the original Denial of Access Complaint submit by this requestor was stamped "RECEIVED" by the New Jersey Government Records Quango on "2018 DEC 3 PM 1 26" at such time four GRC Complaints entitled Miller 5. Twp. of Howell (Monmouth) had already been filed. Furthermore, the specific authorities tape(due south) that would conduct the requested, required and otherwise absent-minded data are non known to be anything other than police reports. As such, any and all Howell Township Constabulary Department reports are requested herein, if non otherwise exempt, thereupon describing any and all threats allegedly made past this requestor confronting anyone who claims to accept been threatened past that very same person in the menstruum between the present date of January thirty, 2019 and the nominal date of September 23, 1986.

2nd , DOES THE Deport OF LOPEZ PRIMA FACIE CONSTITUTE Likely Crusade FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT Against THAT REQUESTOR FOR MAKING TERRORISTIC THREATS? CONVERSELY, IF NO THREATS WERE Actually Fabricated BY THE Accused, AS IS THE FACTUAL REALITY, DOES THE Conduct OF LOPEZ, WITH PERHAPS OTHER ACTORS, Plant I OR MORE VIOLATIONS OF,

Northward.J.Southward.A. 2C:13-5. Criminal compulsion

SPECIFICALLY IN REGARD TO 2C:13-v A(2), 2C:13-5 A(4), 2C:13-5 A(vi), AND/OR 2C:thirteen-five A(7), DESCRIPTIONS OF WHICH CAN Be Constitute IN THE TEXT OF THE NEW Bailiwick of jersey CRIMINAL CODE EXHIBITED BELOW FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.

[ENLARGE]

AN Player COMMITS CRIMINAL COERCION IF HE OR SHE PURPOSEFULLY AND UNLAWFULLY RESTRICTS A PERSON'S ABILITY TO Engage OR REFRAIN FROM ENGAGING IN Comport THROUGH THREATS:

N.J.Southward.A. 2C:13-5 A(2), CONSISTING OF FALSE ACCUSATIONS THAT A PERSON COMMITTED A CRIMINAL AND/OR OTHER OFFENSE.

N.J.South.A. 2C:thirteen-5 A(4), CONSISTING OF AN Activity TAKEN OR WITHHELD Past AN OFFICIAL, OR CONSISTING OF AN Activity THAT WOULD CAUSE AN OFFICIAL TO TAKE OR WITHHOLD ACTION.

N.J.Southward.A. 2C:13-five A(half dozen), CONSISTING OF PROVIDING TESTIMONY OR INFORMATION, OR WITHHOLDING TESTIMONY OR INFORMATION WITH REGARD TO A PERSON'South LEGAL Merits OR Defense.

Due north.J.South.A. 2C:13-5 A(7), CONSISTING OF Whatever OTHER ACT THAT IS INTENDED TO HARM A TARGETED PERSON WITH REGARD TO HIS OR HER HEALTH, SAFETY, Business organization, CALLING, CAREER, FINANCIAL CONDITION, REPUTATION OR PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS.

Tertiary ,WITH REGARD TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED ALBEIT NON-SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS THAT THREATS WERE MADE, We FIRST CONSIDER POTENTIAL VIOLATIONS OF,

N.J.S.A. 2C:12-three. Terroristic threats

WITH ABBREVIATED TEXT OF THAT STATUTE EXHIBITED Beneath As EXCERPTED FROM THE PUBLICLY Accessible DATABASE MAINTAINED THE NEW Jersey Land LEGISLATURE.

[Expand]

AN Histrion IS GUILTY OF MAKING TERRORISTIC THREATS IF HE OR SHE,

N.J.Due south.A. 2C:12-three (A), THREATENS TO COMMIT ANY CRIME OF VIOLENCE WITH INTENT TO TERRORIZE THE TARGETED PERSON, OR MAKES A THREAT THAT RESULTS IN THE EVACUATION OF A Building, PUBLIC Space AND/OR OTHER DEFINED LOCATIONS, AND THE SEVERITY OF THE VIOLATION IS GREATER IF THE Human activity IS COMMITTED DURING A TIME OF DECLARED EMERGENCY. FURTHERMORE, THE ACTOR SHALL Be STRICTLY LIABLE UPON PROOF THAT THE Criminal offence OCCURRED.

North.J.S.A. 2C:12-three (B), THREATENS TO Impale Another PERSON WITH INTENT TO PUT THE TARGETED INDIVIDUAL IN Firsthand FEAR OF DEATH.

FOURTH , Again Because THE UNSPECIFIED NATURE OF THE ALLEGED THREATS, THE DESCRIPTIONS OF CRIMINAL HARASSMENT AND CYBER-HARASSMENT FOUND IN Chapter THIRTY-Three ARE IN ALL LIKELIHOOD WHAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED NEXT FOR ALLEGED COMMUNICATIONS Non EXPLICITLY THREATENING THE LIFE OF AN INDIVIDUAL. EXCERPTS BELOW FROM THE TEXT DESCRIBING VIOLATIONS OF,

N.J.Southward.A. 2C:33-4. Harassment

AND

Northward.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.ane. Cyber-harassment

AN ACTOR COMMITS A PETTY DISORDERLY PERSONS Criminal offence OF HARASSMENT IF HE OR SHE PURPOSEFULLY HARASSES ANOTHER PERSON:

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-four (A), Past MAKING OR EFFECTING Advice(Due south) KNOWN TO Take BEEN INITIATED BY THE ACTOR AT VERY INCONVENIENT HOURS, USING OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE, OR IN SUCH A MANNER Probable TO Crusade ANNOYANCE OR ALARM.

N.J.Due south.A. 2C:33-4 (B), BY EITHER Hit, Kicking, SHOVING, OR OFFENSIVELY TOUCHING THE VICTIM, OR THREATENING TO Exercise And so.

Northward.J.Due south.A. 2C:33-four (C), By ENGAGING IN Whatsoever OTHER COURSE OF ALARMING CONDUCT OR BY REPEATEDLY COMMITTING ACTS INTENDED TO Alert OR SERIOUSLY ANNOY THE VICTIM.

North.J.South.A. 2C:33-4 (East), WHEREBY THE OTHERWISE NON-FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS DESCRIBED IN THE PRECEDING 3 SUBSECTIONS ARE GRADED AS A CRIME OF THE 4th DEGREE IN THE EVENT THE Thespian ENGAGES IN SUCH Acquit WHILE SERVING A TERM OF IMPRISONMENT, WHILE ON PAROLE, OR WHILE ON PROBATION FOLLOWING FROM Conviction OF AN INDICTABLE Law-breaking UNDER THE LAWS OF NEW Bailiwick of jersey, Whatever OTHER STATE OR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

AN ACTOR COMMITS THE 4th Caste CRIME OF CYBER-HARASSMENT IF HE OR SHE MAKES A COMMUNICATION IN AN ONLINE CAPACITY USING Whatever ELECTRONIC DEVICE OR THROUGH A SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE WITH THE PURPOSE TO HARASS THE TARGETED VICTIM THAT DOES:

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 (A)(one), THREATEN TO INFLICT INJURY OR PHYSICAL Impairment TO THE TARGETED VICTIM OR HIS OR HER Property.

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-four.1 (A)(2), KNOWINGLY Ship, POSTS, COMMENTS, REQUESTS, SUGGESTS, OR PROPOSES Whatsoever LEWD, INDECENT OR OBSCENE MATERIAL TO OR Most A PERSON WITH THE INTENT TO EMOTIONALLY Damage A REASONABLE PERSON OR PLACE A REASONABLE PERSON IN Fear OF Concrete OR EMOTIONAL HARM.

N.J.Southward.A. 2C:33-4.1 (A)(iii), THREATEN TO COMMIT Whatever Criminal offense AGAINST THE TARGETED VICTIM OR HIS OR HER Property.

North.J.South.A. 2C:33-4.one (B), OF Note, WHEN COMMUNICATIONS ARE Made Contrary TO THE PRECEDING Iii SUBSECTIONS AT SUCH TIME THE ACTOR IS OVER THE AGE OF TWENTY-Ane AND THE TARGETED VICTIM IS A Small, THE Human action BECOMES A VIOLATION OF THE THIRD-DEGREE.

WHEN THE ACTOR IS Small Nether THE Age OF Xvi, THE Court MAY Order AS A Status OF Judgement:

North.J.S.A. 2C:33-four.1 (C)(1), A Class OR TRAINING Programme INTENDED TO REDUCE THE Pocket-size'S PROCLIVITY TO COMMIT ACTS IN VIOLATION OF THE STATUTE.

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.ane (C)(2), A CLASS OR Grooming Plan INTENDED TO INSTRUCT THE Minor TO THE DANGERS ASSOCIATED WITH CYBER-HARASSMENT.

WHEN A PARENT OR GUARDIAN FAILS TO COMPLY THE Weather condition OF SENTENCE SET Forth IN (C)(1) AND C(2) ABOVE, THAT PARENT OR GUARDIAN IS ADJUDICATED:

N.J.S.A. 2C:33-iv.1 (D), A DISORDERLY PERSON WHO SHALL BE FINED NO More THAN TWENTY-Five DOLLARS FOR A FIRST OFFENSE AND NO More THAN 1-HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR EACH SUBSEQUENT Offense.

Fifth , THE CASE OF PICKETTERS' Accuse DID INCLUDE FOR A Menstruum OF SIXTY-SEVEN DAYS THE PERCEIVED THREAT OF IMMINENT Arrest OR SERVICE OF Procedure OF One OR MORE BRAND NEW CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS FOR ONE OR MORE ALLEGED CRIMINAL ACTS DESCRIBED Every bit "CYBER-HARASSMENT" BY A FEMALE Individual WHO DURING THAT 60-Vii Mean solar day Period WAS ALLEGEDLY THE Defense Chaser OF THE ONE DEFENDANT IN PICKETTERS' Accuse, AND SHE WHO DESPITE NO LESS THAN 3 NOTIFICATIONS THAT HER SERVICES WERE Not DESIRED DID IGNORE THOSE REQUESTS FOR Exchange AS DID Another FEMALE EMPLOYEE OF THE MERCER County TRIAL REGION OPD WHO DID Claim TO Exist HER SUPERIOR. FURTHERMORE, THE Attorney DID MAKE A COMMUNICATION ON OR ABOUT 20-NINTH NOVEMBER 2-G Eighteen By Telephone CALL PLACED TO HER Customer, DURING WHICH Time SHE DID Country MULTIPLE TIMES THAT "THE MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR'South Office IS LOOKING TO CHARGE You", FOR COMMUNICATIONS DESCRIBING A VICTIM THAT SHE DID NOT Identify By Proper name AND SPECIFICALLY REGARDING PUBLIC DISCLOSURES RELATED A DIVORCE THAT WERE ALSO Not Later DESCRIBED BY DOCKET NUMBER, IDENTITY OF A Gauge, THE NAME OF EITHER Political party OR BY WHAT SPECIFIC PUBLIC DISCLOSURES WERE DEEMED CONTRARY TO North.J.Southward.A. 2C:33-iv.1 (A) et seq. THE COMMUNICATIONS AS SUCH WERE NEVER DESCRIBED Equally HAVING BEEN MADE OR Caused TO HAVE BEEN MADE Past THE Defendant, NEVER CLAIMED TO Take BEEN Fabricated ON Any ELECTRONIC DEVICE OR THROUGH A SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE THAT WAS IN Actual FACT Owned OR OPERATED BY THE Defendant, AND OF THE HIGHEST SIGNIFICANCE SOMETHING WAS CLAIMED TO HAVE BEEN POSTED TO A WEBSITE THAT MAY OR MAY Not Have BEEN IDENTIFIED AS "SOMETHING AWFUL", AND REGARDLESS OF WHAT SPECIFIC DOMAIN WAS UTTERED BY THAT ATTORNEY, THE Defendant REMAINS UNAWARES OF ANY PUBLIC DISCLOSURES RELATED TO THE CASE POSTED TO ANY WEBSITE THAT SHE MAY OR MAY NOT Accept Really NAMED, AND FURTHERMORE THE DEFENDANT HER THEN CLIENT WAS CERTAINLY NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANY WEBSITE Equally SUCH.

THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS WERE Too Fabricated BY THAT Attorney DURING THE TWENTY-9th Nov PHONE Conversation:

I, Exclamation THAT Whatsoever DIVORCE PROCEEDING INVOLVING THE Alleged VICTIM IN PICKETTERS' CHARGE ACTIVE CONCOMITANT TO THE CASE COULD Non POSSIBLY Be RELEVANT TO AN AFFIRMATIVE Defense force. THIS Claim WAS Fabricated VERY EMPHATICALLY, IN Fashion One MIGHT DESCRIBE NEAR Borderline HYSTERICAL, REPEATEDLY ASSERTED, APPROX "THERE IS NO POSSIBLE WAY It COULD BE RELATED".

TWO, EXPLICIT REFUSALS TO ASCERTAIN WHETHER A OR THE DIVORCE PROCEEDING RESULTED IN Financial Gain OR LOSS FOR EITHER Party.

THREE, WOULD NOT ENTERTAIN POSSIBILITY THAT DEFENDANT MAY Take BEEN SUBJECT OF DIVORCE ON-Record TESTIMONY AND/OR DESCRIBED IN OTHER Courtroom DOCUMENTS. OF NOTE, Attorney WITH NO KNOWLEDGE OF HISTORY Betwixt Defendant AND Alleged VICTIM PROVIDED BY DEFENDANT UNLESS SHE DID READ DOAC SERES VS LAWRENCE, Note RETURNED TWENTY-EIGHTH JANUARY TWO-K Xix, INCLUDING INVITE TO WEDDING OF THE ALLEGED VICTIM AND HUSBAND, BOTH OF WHOM NAMED ON EACH OF Iii VERSIONS OF A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER THAT DID Appear TO BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE Against THE Defendant IN A SIMULTANEOUS CRIMINAL PROCEEDING CONTRARY TO N.J.S.A. 2C: 25-29 BY VIRTUE OF INCLUSION IN FIFTY-Ii PAGE DISCOVERY Packet FIRST PROVIDED TO DEFENDANT FIRST October Ii-THOUSAND Eighteen AT INITIAL DISPOSITION CONFERENCE.

FOUR, Merits THAT ENTIRE DOAC SERIES VS LAWRENCE DID NOT Affair, UNCLEAR IF SHE WAS Even Enlightened OF CONTENT OR HOW THAT CONTENT RELATED TO AFFIRMATIVE Defence.

SIXTH,THE HISTORY OF PICKETTERS' CHARGE Every bit RECORDED Past ZONE ON FOURTEENTH January TWO-THOUSAND Xix, EXHIBITED IN THE TWENTY-Ii IMAGES SEEN BELOW,

SEVENTH, THE 20-EIGHTH January Ii-G Nineteen Series OF A Well-nigh IDENTICAL GROUP OF SHEETS THIS TIME DIRECTLY REQUESTED USING THE Form EXHIBITED IN POSITION ONE WHICH DID YIELD THIS Series PURPORTING TO DESCRIBE A HISTORY OF PICKETTERS' Charge. SPOT THE Difference FROM THE FOURTEENTH January LOT IN THE Xx-SEVEN IMAGES EXHIBITED BELOW,

Eighth, THE Quaternary FEBRUARY 2-THOUSAND NINETEEN Serial THAT DID Marker THE Determination OF PICKETTERS' CHARGE IN ZONE IS EXHIBITED IN FIVE IMAGES BELOW, AND DO INDEED PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE REMARK ON CORRESPONDENCE ALLEGEDLY NEVER SENT TO HUNTERDON COUNTY.

---

STAY TUNED!

jonesbronds.blogspot.com

Source: https://baetylwellness.com/tag/the-mercer-county-prosecutors-office/

Share this post